In my opinion, Judge Thompson, who heard the case about signature verification and tossed it out is not fit to judge the distance between two eggs in a carton. Despite the mountain of evidence that proves signatures were not matched, Thompson tossed the case out, proving once again that you can’t fix corruption. Lake’s lawyers provided video proof that tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of signatures were never checked as prescribed by Arizona state law.
The new Munite Entry states;
CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER“Rather than trying to cast doubt on a specific number of ballots (a herculean evidentiary endeavor in these circumstances), she attempts to prove that the signature review process for Maricopa County was not conducted pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-550(A) or the EPM.”
Kari Lake attorney Kurt Olsen told the Court:
“11 of the signature verification workers approved 170k signatures at a rate of less than 0 and 2.99 seconds with a 99.97% approval rating.” Later, in closing argument, Olsen revealed that “there were approximately 274,000 ballot signatures compared and verified in less than three seconds.”
Olsen also concluded that at least 70,000 mail-in ballots were not verified correctly in accordance with Arizona law and therefore the election should be set aside and a new vote taken. Maricopa County signature reviewer Jacqueline Onigkeit testified that many of the mail-in ballots, she saw were signed with a different name than the person allegedly voting. This case could be going back to the Supreme Court of Arizona, depending on what Kari Lake’s major announcement coming at 4 PM. She could announce an appeal or she could announce that she is running for the US Senate.
Onikgeit said:
Many other level-one signature reviewers “didn’t feel comfortable with what they were seeing.”
“Ballots were sent back to level one reviewers by direct supervisors and full-time County employees:
“Because they were too “overwhelmed” by the number of rejections.”
The Gateway Pundit reported on days one, two, and three of the bombshell trial exposing corruption in Maricopa County’s early voting system.
Maricopa County signature reviewer Jacqueline Onigkeit testified that she saw a large number of signatures on ballot affidavits that were different names than the voter and that many other level-one signature reviewers “didn’t feel comfortable with what they were seeing.”
“ballots were sent back to level one reviewers by direct supervisors and full-time County employees” because they were too “overwhelmed” by the number of rejections, said Onikgeit.
Damning evidence of at least one Maricopa County signature reviewer simply clicking through signature checks in less than two seconds each was also presented by Lake’s attorneys.
The Gateway Pundit later reported on another video showing a Maricopa County employee failing to verify signatures and likely approving over 5,600 signatures in about two hours.
Maricopa County Election Director Rey Valenzuela testified that this individual was “removed from the process.” However, the evidence proves that he was not.
According to the testimony by Jacqueline Onigkeit, signature reviewers “were told to scroll down and make sure that we verify the present green affidavit with the past history affidavits.”
It would be impossible to truly compare two signatures in this short amount of time without fraud. See examples of the fraudulent signatures previously accepted by Maricopa County here.
Despite the evidence, Maricopa County attorneys and the Judge disregarded the employees who did not follow the law. Instead, they claimed the testimony of Lake’s witnesses — signature verification workers who chose to follow the law — proved that the mail-in ballot system is secure.
Kari Lake is expected to appeal this ruling again all the way to the Arizona Supreme Court.
