Jake Tapper who was once a journalist before he became a full time propagandist claims that the failed border bill would lead to citizenship had it been passed. Sen Rubio was quick to dispute that claim and he destroyed Tapper in the process.
Tapper questioned:
CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER“They say this is better than nothing, it should become law. Are you saying that the Border Patrol union is wrong?”
Rubio stated that it was wrong because it would confer citizenship on illegal aliens:
“Yes, if that’s what they still believe, they’re wrong. It’s not better than nothing. Look, there are some things in that bill that we should do – change the asylum standard and the like. Here’s what else the bill did. The bill basically creates an asylum court. It creates a bunch of – thousands of bureaucrats, basically asylum agents, that would be empowered right at the border to either allow people into the country with an immediate work permit, today they have to wait six months.”
“You give them an immediate work permit, you’re going to have more people coming, that’s a huge magnet. Or they have the power to immediately release them and grant them asylum which now puts them on a five year path to citizenship, which is what a lot of Democrats want. They want to turn a bunch of illegal immigrants, into citizens, into voters, in the hopes that those people will then turn around and vote for them in future elections, grateful because they’ll know who let them in. That’s a huge problem. That doesn’t solve the border, it makes it worse.”
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELTapper then tried to once again make the case that the bill would not lead to citizenship. To which Rubio explained:
“Yes, it does. Absolutely it does. No, no, yes it does. When you have asylum, you are on a path to citizenship. When you get asylum you are a year away from a green card, four years away from citizenship, absolutely it does. And these bureaucrats would have the power to grant you asylum – not even a judge, a bureaucrat.”
Rubio appeared on “State of the Union” to discuss the ongoing border crisis and recently failed bipartisan senate border security deal. During the Florida senator’s interview, Tapper questioned Rubio on whether previous support for the deal from the Border Patrol union was wrong.
Rubio stated that the Border Patrol union’s support of the deal was “wrong” by noting that it was “not better than nothing.” Rubio went on to highlight a major issue he saw with the bill “basically” creating an “asylum court” that would’ve eventually granted thousands of immigrants a “path to citizenship.”
Following Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson’s refusal to grant additional foreign aid unless the U.S.’s southern border crisis was included late last year, Senate lawmakers had been working together to create a bipartisan deal. After months of negotiations, the Senate released the long-awaited text on Feb. 4.
The potential $118 billion deal would have given $48 billion to aid Ukraine as it continues its war with Russia, roughly $16 billion for Israel against its fight with Hamas, and an estimated $20 billion would address border security reforms. However, upon the release of the text Republicans quickly slammed the bill, with Johnson stating that the bill would be “dead on arrival” if it passed through the Senate.
I just like the valuable information you supply on your articles. I will bookmark your blog and take a look at again here regularly. I’m fairly certain I’ll be told plenty of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!
Spot on with this write-up, I truly assume this website wants much more consideration. I’ll most likely be once more to read way more, thanks for that info.
You really make it appear really easy along with your presentation however I in finding this topic to be actually one thing which I feel I’d never understand. It sort of feels too complicated and extremely broad for me. I am looking ahead on your subsequent submit, I’ll try to get the cling of it!