In Trump’s current trial, the MSM says that Trump is scared, but for some reason, they do not mention what Stormy Daniels is in for. MSNBC analyst and former federal prosecutor Charles Coleman lays out the scenario of his prediction, and he assumes that Trump will admit to having sex with Daniels. I’m not so sure. President Trump has said from Day One that he never has sex with her. They have a letter she wrote in which she says they never had sex.
And then there is this:
I spoke with Michael Avenatti, who at one time had an office in the same building as one of my businesses in Newport Beach, CA (in November 2018, a few days after his arrest on suspicion of domestic violence, Avenatti’s law firm was evicted from those same offices in Newport Beach after skipping $213,000 worth of rent payments.).”
“Avenatti was working a long con against Tully’s Coffee and actor Patrick Dempsey. Avenatti Global Baristas, the parent company of the Tully’s coffee chain that was founded by Michael Avenatti, had agreed to never again use the Tully’s name, but Avenatti was lying.”
“In any case, Avenatti shared details of his client Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, case and the fact that her and Michael Cohen were actually having an affair since 2006.”
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELAnd then, Seruga drops a bombshell:
“The whole hush money scheme was cooked up by Michael Cohen to extort the Trump Organization before the 2016 election. Avenatti seemed pleased at how deviant Michael Cohen was.”
Coleman told host Chris Jansing:
“I do think, on cross we are going to see a different animal emerge. And what I mean by that is I expect that Donald Trump’s attorneys are going to drill into the fact that … at its core, this is about blackmail. You slept with a married man, who you likely knew was married, and then you wanted to get money from the fact that you didn’t want to go out and tell the fact that you had made this decision, and ultimately does that change what Donald Trump did? No. Is that the what the case is about? No.”
“But it is going to be something that I fully expect that the defense attorneys in this case are going to try to pummel her on as much as they can to detract from her overall credibility in front of the jury. And I do think there may be some sympathy among the jurors around that to basically say, look, she does not come to the table with clean hands either, and who knows what sort of impact that will have in terms of their deliberations.”
“Honestly, it’s not necessarily the narrative that you’re selling. It’s more so the preparation around your demeanor, your attitude, your tone, your intonation, your responses in such a way that you don’t come across as overly defensive, rude or just nasty in front of the jury. That’s really what you spend the most time preparing your witness around.”
