You’ve got to hand it to President Trump—he’s been playing 4D chess against the left-wing activist judges who keep trying (and failing) to derail his America First agenda. Since reclaiming the White House in January, more than 50 lawsuits have been filed trying to stop him. But here’s the thing they never thought about—his administration saw this coming from a mile away and has been countering every legal attack like a seasoned grandmaster.
Case in point: Mahmood Khalil, a Syrian national here on a green card, was living it up at Columbia University, openly cheering for Hamas and calling for the destruction of Western civilization. Not exactly the best way to secure your stay in the land of the free. So, Homeland Security stepped in, arrested him, and set the wheels in motion to revoke his green card and send him packing.
Because, let’s be real: A green card is not US citizenship. Non-citizens cannot advocate for terrorist activity and expect to stay in the country. We know that the libnuts like to equate illegal aliens to citizens by letting them stay here even after illegally entering the country, getting driver’s licenses, and in some blue libnut jurisdictions even voting in elections. But the reality is non-citizens cannot chant, “Death to America!” and stay here. Seems like common sense, right? Well, not if you’re a leftist judge.
Sure enough, Judge Jesse Furman—your classic New York activist libnut judge—jumped into action and blocked the deportation of the terrorist-loving, America-hating Khalil, insisting on a court hearing and legal representation for both sides.
And this is where Trump’s strategy really shines. These left-wing lawsuits always go down the same way—activists run straight to a deep-blue state judge who’s itching to rule against Trump so they can brag about it at the bar that night.
But guess what? The Trump administration was ten steps ahead. Before Furman’s order could take effect, Homeland Security had Khalil transferred to an ICE detention center in Louisiana—a nice, red-state venue that’s noticeably lacking in activist judges. You see, the federal government can legally do that. They can send a perp anywhere in the US of A.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELWhy does this matter? Because legal petitions have to be filed in the federal district where the detainee is being held. By moving Khalil out of New York—the leftist playground of judicial activism—Judge Furman instantly lost jurisdiction. Now, with Khalil in a solid red state, the odds of finding an activist judge to bail him out just dropped to near zero.
While the Khalil case is a fantastic example of how Trump is outmaneuvering these activist judges on a case-by-case basis, he’s also working on something even bigger—a long-term plan to eliminate judicial activism altogether.
Now, this is really cool. Trump’s Justice Department, led by Pam Bondi, has formally asked the Supreme Court to overturn a century-old ruling that has been the left’s go-to tool for blocking presidential authority. It’s called Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935), and if you’ve never heard of it, listen up.
What Is Humphrey’s Executor, and Why Does It Matter?
Back in 1935, the Supreme Court decided that the president couldn’t fire officials from “independent” government agencies at will. One of these agencies was the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which the ruling conveniently declared not part of the executive branch—meaning the president had no direct control over it. How were they able to do that? They weren’t. They just did it and out of deference to the judiciary, no one ever cried foul. That is, until now.
The whole thing sounds ridiculous, right? That’s because it is. The FTC is absolutely an executive agency, yet this ruling has been used time and again to undermine presidential authority.
Now, Trump’s Justice Department has had enough. They’re taking the fight to the Supreme Court, demanding that this outdated ruling be overturned and full executive authority restored—finally allowing presidents to fire entrenched bureaucrats who have been hiding behind this legal loophole for decades.
Wait for the coming Supreme Court showdown.
This could all come to a head by June or July, when the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the matter. And guess what? There are already at least four justices leaning toward striking down Humphrey’s Executor. If that happens, get ready for some fireworks.
If the ruling is overturned:
✅ Trump’s executive power is fully restored
✅ Judicial activism against the president is effectively over
✅ Left-wing lawsuits designed to obstruct MAGA policies will disappear
✅ Left-wing activists start wetting their pants. (I added this one for fun)
This is why Justice Samuel Alito has been openly frustrated with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett for letting activist judges keep challenging Trump’s policies. Alito knows exactly what’s going on and has argued that activist judges have no business obstructing the constitutional authority of the president.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked a question during a press briefing recently about Khalil and here’s how she responded to the preparations for his deportation.
WATCH:
President Trump and his administration are not just playing defense against activist judges—they’re strategically dismantling the entire legal framework that has enabled them to obstruct executive power for nearly a century.
The Khalil case? Just a warm-up. If the Supreme Court overturns Humphrey’s Executor, it will go down as one of the greatest victories for executive power in American history. The left-wing judicial system that has spent years trying to block Trump’s America First policies? Completely demolished.
#trump2024 #judicialreform #maga
