Megyn Kelly Responds To NYT For Accusing Her Of Spreading Misinformation About Paul Pelosi Attack.

Megyn Kelly is up in arms after the New York Times article claimed she was spreading misinformation over the alleged attack on Paul Pelosi.

The story keeps changing and the San Francisco Police Department refuses to release anything about the attack. If this was a cut-and-dried attack, then the police would have released the details of the assault. Journalists are supposed to question stories when there is no disclosure. They won’t even allow ICE to interview DePape who is an illegal alien with an ICE detainer on DePape.

The New York Times is accusing Kelly of spreading misinformation, even though she has not. She has questioned why the SFPD  is not releasing information as they would normally do.

She also questions why the story keeps changing. But, not only is that normal but it is supposed to be what journalists do. But, you can’t blame the NYT because they have no journalists working for them, so I assume they just don’t know any better.

Kelly fired back on Monday, tweeting:

“The NYT lists me as a spreader of misinfo re the P Pelosi attack bc I ‘raised doubts that all facts were being disclosed.’ It’s called JOURNALISM. SFPD clearly has more to disclose but if u ask for it, you’re a ‘misinfo’ spreader like @Miguelnbc. Grow up, NYT & DO YOUR JOB.”

The NYT lists me as a spreader of misinfo re the P Pelosi attack bc I “raised doubts that all facts were being disclosed.”
It’s called JOURNALISM. SFPD clearly has more to disclose but if u ask for it, you’re a “misinfo” spreader like @Miguelnbc. Grow up, NYT & DO YOUR JOB.

— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) November 7, 2022

Kelly said on her podcast on October 31:

“We are learning more about who the intruder was, but many questions remain about the circumstances of the crime, which police have been fairly tight-lipped about and actually contradictory as well.”

 “Rushing to make this about right-wing political violence, and not just that, not just right-wing political violence, this is about January 6, don’t you know? This is about January 6, like everything needs to be for the Democrats today; not homelessness, not crime, not mental illness, January 6; back to that. They will use it for all it’s worth and then some.”

Kelly condemns the NYT for trying to tie the alleged attack on Paul Pelosi with January 6th and make DePape look like a crazed conservative. I don’t know about you, but I have never seen a nudist conservative who lives on a bus with BLM and  LGBTQ flags flying on the front, have you? If the SFPD were more forthcoming and produced its evidence, all of the speculation would disappear. Are they hiding something? I don’t know.

The article stated:

The flood of falsehoods showed how ingrained misinformation has become inside the G.O.P., where the reflexive response of the rank and file — and even a few prominent figures — to anything that might cast a negative light on the right is to deflect with more fictional claims, creating a vicious cycle that muddies facts, shifts blame and minimizes violence. It happened after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, which was inspired by Mr. Trump’s lie of a stolen election, and in turn gave rise to more falsehoods.

Kelly fired back:

“The press has gone deep, dark down the rabbit hole about trying to say, ‘This is all about January 6’ because the lunatic’s latest iteration of craziness was focused on some QAnon theories, things along those lines, notwithstanding his BLM flag and his LGBTQ flag out in front of it.”

From The Daily Wire

She condemned the media, saying they were “rushing to make this about right-wing political violence, and not just that, not just right-wing political violence, this is about January 6, don’t you know? This is about January 6, like everything needs to be for the Democrats today; not homelessness, not crime, not mental illness, January 6; back to that. They will use it for all it’s worth and then some.”

Kelly’s claim that the media was trying to turn the attack on Pelosi into another instance connected to January 6 was further confirmed in the article which claimed she was spreading misinformation.