Democrats have long given up trying to debate conservatives on the issues because it always leaves with them bleeding on the side of the debate floor. That was before the Democrats added the word disinformation onto the political scene. They finally saw the light and discovered that screaming misinformation is as effective as their standard accusation of racism. Everything conservative is racist and every conservative fact is misinformation. Unsubstantiated charges of racism is the dying gasp of an extremely weak mind.
Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson is proposing a bill to crack down on the freedom of speech. It would criminalize the spread of misinformation or anything that is politically damaging to the Marxist Democrats would be subject to penalties. The US constitution provides the right to free speech, but the Democratic party does not. Both Republicans and Democrats believe in freedom of speech. Where they differ is conservatives believe in freedom after speech, which the Marxists do not.
According to people who have seen the bill, it is the state version of the Ministry of truth that Democrats failed to achieve at the national level. The similarities between Orwell’s “1984” and the Biden administration are frighteningly very much alike. The only difference between Joe Biden and Big Brother is the mustache. HB 1333 describes the duties of the proposed commission as involving efforts to “combat disinformation and misinformation”. To Democrats, conservative free speech is “domestic violent extremism.”
The bill is very vague about what constitutes disinformation. This is intentional because it allows Democrats to continually re-address what disinformation is.
Further, the commission, though charged with examining ways to treat “domestic violent extremism.” as a health issue in an effort to work around the US constitution. They could then use the State Department of Health as the legal controlling authority behind the bill.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELThe basic idea is to “take preemptive measures to stop actual domestic terrorist acts through community intervention.”
Such “community intervention” could include, for example, compelling people identified as “extremists” to undergo counseling, according to Rantz’s interpretation of comments Ferguson made in an interview with PBS in January.
When PBS host Laura Barrón-López asked Ferguson what the public health approach would look like in practice, Ferguson responded, in part:
Let’s engage in prevention, of getting folks — avoiding them being radicalized in the first place. If somebody is radicalized, and wants removal, move away from that, how can we help them with counseling, for example, to get them away from that ideology?
So, looking at from a more holistic standpoint, we think, addresses prevention, addresses helping folks who’ve been radicalized and take a more holistic view of this to address what is a huge challenge, not just in Washington state, but all across the country.
KTTH‘s Jason Rantz reported:
“They say this is about violence, but it’s not about violence. It’s actually about speech.”
“We already have laws on the books that very clearly address violence. What they’re trying to do with this commission is create what they’re calling a ‘public health approach’ to some of these ideologies.”
“They are singularly focused on the Right,” Rantz said flatly. “What this commission will end up doing is recommending legislation that could not only lead to imprisoning people for having certain kinds of political positions, but also forcing them into counseling.”
