The judge questioned the honesty of a CNN hack? He should have taken it on faith that he was lying through his teeth. Things are not looking good for CNN in this lawsuit as the judge has already found that Zachary Young and his lawyers “sufficiently proffered evidence of actual malice, express malice, and a level of conduct outrageous enough to open the door for him to seek punitive damages.”
Those included internal messaging at CNN that the network wanted the story to be Young’s “funeral” and its descriptions of Young in obscene terms.
CNN labeled Young a criminal for trying to get women out of Afghanistan after the Harris/Biden regime abandoned them to the Taliban. So, what did CNN use as an excuse for calling Young a criminal for trying to save women from the Taliban? They claim they were justified because Young broke Sharia law. Raping women and sodomizing young boys is okay by Sharia standards but saving the lives of women is a criminal act. Naturally, the judge did not accept this explanation.
The rules are known for their extremism, such as a call for the amputation of a thief’s hands, for killing people for criticizing the Quran, for killing people who deny Muhammad was a prophet, for killing people who lead a Muslim away from Islam, for killing a non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman, for killing homosexuals (although sodomizing young boys is allowed), and for “taqiyya” or lying to non-Muslims.
A Revolver report had explained:
“They’re actually legitimizing (and defending) Sharia Law, which routinely abuses women, sometimes to death, in an effort to try and win that billion-dollar lawsuit. In the process, they’re also branding the Navy Vet at the center of the defamation suit a ‘criminal’ for trying to save women’s lives.”
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELThe judge’s decision to allow the deposition of Tapper followed his reported comments that “I kind of have a hard time believing what Mr. Tapper put in that declaration.,” Turley reported.
“Since that is a sworn declaration made under penalty of perjury, it was a stinging rebuke,” Turley said.
Depositions already have detailed the evidence in the case, and the next step is to consider the network’s financial position.
Turley said, “The court clearly believes that Tapper could have some relevant information since he holds one of the most lucrative contracts at CNN and is familiar with the corporate finances in relation to his show.”
What's the most ridiculous, desperate thing CNN could do to try to get out the $ 1 billion defamation suit against them?
This is it:
CNN cites Sharia law for their innocence in defamation suit, argue Navy vet is a criminal for saving women https://t.co/b2OT9LAu9G— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) August 5, 2024
A man rescues 24 women and children and @CNN goes after him and it’s going to cost them 1 BILLION DOLLARS! pic.twitter.com/8Q1wtB2QKI
— The Older Millennial (@teameffujoe) August 5, 2024
Now constitutional expert and George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley notes that the fight is over CNN’s agenda to cast Young in a bad light through a report about “Afghans trying to get out of the country face a black market full of promises, demands of exorbitant fees, and no guarantee of safety or success.”
CNN claims it was right to suggest a criminality in Young’s behavior because, “To get women out, the operators on the ground were required either to break the law directly or to find someone to break the law for them.” That would be Shariah law.
