All it took for Abigail Spanberger to lose a significant share of Virginia voters was something simple. She stopped keeping up the act.
Back in 2020, Democrats lost 14 seats in the House. That loss shook the party. It forced a moment of reflection. Spanberger, who was serving in Congress at the time, spoke openly about what went wrong. She did not hold back.
“We need to not ever use the word ‘socialist’ or ‘socialism’ ever again,” she said during a House Democratic Caucus call after the election. “Because while people think it doesn’t matter, it does matter, and we lost good members because of that.”
That statement reveals the real issue. It was never about changing policies. It was about changing how those policies were described. Remove the label, soften the language, and hope voters do not notice.
Now move ahead a few years. Spanberger runs for governor in 2025. She presents herself as calm and moderate. A steady presence. Someone who brings people together. The media supports that image. Voters accept it.
Then reality begins to catch up.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL“She’s just a bot for the Democratic Party.”
That line captures what many Virginians are now starting to believe. The moderate image is fading.
A new Washington Post and Schar School poll has been released, and the numbers are not encouraging. Spanberger’s approval rating is already unusually low for this point in a term.
According to the poll, 47 percent approve of her performance. Thirty-six percent disapprove. Seven percent are unsure. At first glance, that might not seem alarming. The context tells a different story. That approval number sits 13 points below the historical average for governors.
Political analyst Larry Sabato did not try to soften it.
“A drop of that margin is stunning, and it should be greatly disturbing to the governor and the governor’s staff if it’s repeated in other surveys.”
So what changed?
The details in the poll provide the answer.
Forty-five percent of voters now believe Spanberger is too liberal. That includes 91 percent of Republicans, nearly half of independents, and even some Democrats. Around 10 percent of her own voters now think she leans too far left.
That is a serious problem.
Immigration is one major factor.
Spanberger reversed a policy from former Governor Glenn Youngkin that required cooperation with federal immigration authorities. She went further and instructed state agencies to cut ties with ICE.
That decision drew attention in Washington.
Lauren Bis, Deputy Assistant Secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, grouped Spanberger with so-called sanctuary politicians. She accused them of slowing down ICE and releasing criminals into communities, which she said leads to more victims.
Strong language like that does not go unnoticed.
The Department of Homeland Security also highlighted a troubling statistic. They stated that in 2026, illegal immigrants have allegedly been responsible for 75 percent of murders in Fairfax County, Virginia.
Whether people accept that claim or not is beside the point. Perception is what shapes public opinion. Right now, that perception is shifting.
Energy policy is another issue.
Spanberger pushed Virginia back into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. This program operates as a cap and trade system. Critics argue it acts as a hidden tax. Youngkin withdrew the state from it for that reason. Spanberger brought it back.
That decision affects people directly. Higher utility bills are hard to ignore.
Then there is redistricting.
This is where the situation becomes more political.
In 2019, Spanberger strongly opposed gerrymandering.
“Gerrymandering is detrimental to our democracy, and it weakens the individual voices that form our electorates. Opposing gerrymandering should be a bipartisan priority.”
That was her position.
Now she supports a constitutional amendment that critics say could secure Democratic control of 10 out of 11 congressional seats in Virginia.
That is not a small adjustment. That is a complete reversal.
Her office denies any behind-the-scenes deals. Critics remain skeptical. New district maps appear to favor areas like Fairfax while reducing the influence of rural voters.
One district has already attracted multiple Democratic candidates before voters have even weighed in on the referendum.
That raises questions.
Gun policy is another area where voters see a shift.
Spanberger once presented herself as balanced on the issue. She pointed to her experience as a federal agent. She spoke about responsibility.
“I’m a mother of three girls in Virginia Public Schools. I’m also a former federal agent who carried a gun every single day for my job,” she said at a 2025 rally. “So I come at this issue as someone who cares deeply about the safety of our kids and as someone who understands the responsibilities of owning and of carrying a firearm.”
That message resonated with many voters.
Now she is expected to approve sweeping gun restrictions supported by more progressive lawmakers.
That feels like a different direction.
When you look at everything together, the numbers begin to make sense.
Spanberger’s disapproval rating now stands at 46 percent. That is the highest for any Virginia governor at this stage since 1994.
Compare that to Glenn Youngkin, who had a 54 percent approval rating at the same point. Mark Warner had 78 percent approval. Even Terry McAuliffe and Ralph Northam had stronger numbers.
The contrast is clear.
What makes this more surprising is the size of Spanberger’s victory. She defeated Winsome Sears by 15 points. That kind of margin suggests strong support.
Yet only months later, her numbers are slipping.
Mark Rozell of George Mason University explained that some division is expected in politics. That is normal. A drop this sharp, this early, after running as a centrist, is unusual.
Not everyone believes she is too liberal. About 7 percent of voters think she is actually too conservative.
So where does that leave her?
Stuck between two sides. Losing trust from both. Facing voters who feel they were promised one thing and received something else.
That is what happens when the image does not match reality.
At some point, people figure it out.
#spanberger #virginiapolitics #election2026
