Let’s remind everyone that Joe Biden illegally allowed so many millions of illegal aliens into the country that it would take over 10 years of non-stop court hearings to get to half of them. And here we are.
In a recent House Judiciary Committee hearing, Representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas delivered yet another tirade attacking America’s law enforcement officers. Her comments were not only irresponsible but dangerous, promoting hostility toward the very people who keep our communities safe.
Crockett claimed the current administration and law enforcement agencies are “racist” and compared officers to “slave patrols.” Statements like these are designed to divide the country and undermine public trust in police. Good officers who put their lives on the line daily deserve respect, not slander from members of Congress who should know better.
Instead of acknowledging the difficult and often thankless work law enforcement performs, Crockett painted officers as “lawless people” who “round people up” and “disappear them.” She ignored the reality that police follow warrants, procedures, and laws crafted by the very legislative body she sits in. Her attacks were aimed primarily at ICE agents, who enforce immigration laws passed by Congress. If Crockett dislikes those laws, she should work to change them rather than demonize the officers sworn to uphold them.
“Her exact statement was, “We’re talking about lawless people that are going around with no warrants or anything, and it’s all about rounding people up and disappearing them.”
Crockett went so far as to claim modern policing “was born out of slave patrols,” a historically inaccurate talking point often used by activists who want to abolish police altogether. She says she spoke with a federal law enforcement officer who supposedly told her culture comes from the top, then accuses national leadership of being “racist.” Her entire argument rests on the idea that officers are inherently bad unless they follow her political ideology.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELHer anti-police rhetoric didn’t stop there. Crockett compared ICE agents to “thugs,” accused them of breaking into homes and “breaking people’s arms,” and even likened them to the Ku Klux Klan. These are outrageous charges, designed to inflame emotions rather than address facts. ICE agents rescue trafficking victims, prevent drug smuggling, and remove violent criminals from communities. Branding them as villains puts both officers and civilians in danger.
But what it really shows is how desperate Democrats like Jasmine Crockett have become. She’s pulling out all the party racist rhetoric designed to stir up anger, hate, and, in many cases, violence against perceived enemies. Calling law enforcement officers racists, KKK members, making false claims about how they perform their duties, and all the other vile crap that she and her cohorts throw out there every day does the country, and specifically the communities involved, a great disservice. Jasmine Crockett is using a familiar political tactic, stirring up outrage with exaggerated claims to keep her base angry and energized. She isn’t informing her constituents, she’s inflaming them with misinformation to drive turnout and secure support built on emotion rather than truth. The real danger in Jasmine Crockett’s approach is that some people will take her inflammatory rhetoric at face value. When a public official spreads exaggerated accusations and outright falsehoods, it can fuel anger, fear, and hostility. And in communities already under strain, that kind of misinformation can push unstable or easily influenced individuals toward destructive behavior. Reckless political messaging doesn’t just distort the truth; it creates real risks for public safety.
She then praised Chicago’s far-left mayor as a “man of valor” fighting a “villain,” a stunning inversion of reality given Chicago’s continued crime problems and the mayor’s habit of blaming police rather than criminals.
Crockett tried to frame routine immigration enforcement as “cruel and unusual punishment” and cited detainee deaths while ignoring the context, medical backgrounds, or the fact that thousands more lives are saved each year by ICE’s work in intercepting violent offenders. She highlighted a case involving an individual with diabetes, but failed to mention that ICE has strict medical guidelines and investigates all medical incidents thoroughly.
WATCH THIS NONSENSE
Crockett then launched into a series of rhetorical questions, asking whether it is “great or gross” for authorities to remove individuals violating immigration law, enforce court orders, or stop people who entered the country illegally. Her audience repeatedly responded “gross” as she attempted to portray law enforcement as oppressors rather than protectors.
To answer some of the accusations Crockett made against ICE officers, I give you, of all outlets, NPR, which published a piece in September 2025, headlined, “What ICE agents can and cannot legally do during arrests.” Remember, NPR is a left-wing biased news source, which is why the Trump administration defunded them because conservative and independent taxpayers should not have to pay for a news source that normally sides with the left any more than they should pay for a news source that sides with the right.
The article was written in question and answer format:
Q. Federal law gives immigration officials power to arrest and question immigrants. What are those powers? Can they make arrests without warrants?
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency in charge of immigration enforcement, was created after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Congress gave the burgeoning agency wide power to question, search and arrest [illegal] immigrants, or those believed to be [illegal] immigrants, without a warrant.
Those are very powerful powers for law enforcement. It means that federal officers can question, search, and arrest people whom they believe are illegal immigrants. Notice how NPR conveniently left out the word illegal before immigrants. The left constantly conflates the two.
The piece went on:
The Immigration and Nationality Act states that in order to arrest someone without a warrant, officers must have cause, or reasonable suspicion, to believe that a person is in the U.S. illegally and likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained.
“Leaving aside border checkpoints, immigration officers have power to consensually question anyone, just like a police officer does; but to detain someone even briefly they require individualized suspicion that the person is violating the immigration laws,” UCLA’s Arulanantham says.
Q. Are immigration enforcement agents allowed to wear masks or otherwise refuse to identify themselves?
The widespread masking of immigration agents in the streets and even in federal courthouses has stoked fear among immigrant communities and strong objections from civil rights groups. But acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons, has said it’s a necessary response to what he describes as efforts to dox and threaten these agents and their families. ICE has said there has been a dramatic increase in the doxing of agents but has not said how many cases there have been or provided any details. The agency has not provided any information to support their assertion of an increase in agent doxxing.
But Nathan-Pineau says this violates a federal requirement that immigration agents identify themselves as agents as soon as it is “practical” and “safe” to do so during an arrest. (They are not, however, required to provide their personal names.) She says the regulation is interpreted as agents are allowed not to identify themselves during emergency situations where they have to work fast. But she says she doesn’t think the current situation constitutes an emergency that would justify agents not identifying what agency they work for.
Does Nathan-Pineau honestly believe ICE agents sneak into neighborhoods dressed like undercover extras in a spy movie? Every actual enforcement operation shows ICE wearing jackets, vests, badges, and gear with “ICE” plastered all over them. They’re not hiding who they are. They’re not pretending to be civilians. There is no shadow army of undercover ICE agents doing secret street raids. That storyline exists only in the imaginations of activists and politicians who hope you never check the facts.
Politicians like Jasmine Crockett push the cartoonish idea that ICE agents sit around a conference room every morning, throw a dart at a city map, and then storm whatever neighborhood it hits to drag away anyone who looks Hispanic. They know that isn’t how law enforcement operates, but they sell that fantasy anyway because they assume their voters are stupid and won’t question it. It’s a political narrative built on insulting the intelligence of the very people they claim to represent.
This kind of political theater does nothing to solve problems. It only encourages hostility toward officers and spreads falsehoods about the work they perform to protect their communities. Law enforcement officers are not thugs, racists, or slave patrols. They are husbands, wives, fathers, mothers, sons, and daughters who risk their safety so that the rest of us can live in secure neighborhoods. And any politician who trashes them with lies should be ashamed of themselves.
What America needs is more support for law enforcement, not more elected officials who smear them for political points. The country is safer when officers are respected, departments are funded, and the rule of law is upheld. Jasmine Crockett’s remarks were an insult to every officer who has ever worn a badge with integrity and honor.
Her anti-police agenda may play well on activist social media pages, but it does not reflect the truth. It reflects a growing and dangerous movement inside Congress that prefers to vilify law enforcement rather than stand with the men and women who protect this nation.
America is stronger with its police, not with politicians who tear them down.
#lawenforcementmatters #securetheborder #stopthelies
