ABC is trying to cover up their debate interference without directly admitting what is obvious to every one else. They are panicking over the fact that an alleged whistleblower has come forward confirming what we already knew. Nothing will be done to ABC executives before the election and for that reason nothing should be done before President Trump announces the name of his new Attorney General. At least criminally. But next year Attorney Generals in all of the red states should bring election interference charges against them.
Not just ABC itself, but against the executives who planned the rigged debate and the two moderator as well. The only way to prevent this from happening again is to send them all to prison and if possible, revoke their broadcast license and take them off the air. It is also imperative to find outt how Disney may have been involved in this fiasco.
On September 12, the debate bias claims were further fueled by a viral tweet from the account “Black Insurrectionist,” which claimed to have an affidavit from a whistleblower within ABC News:
“I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.”
The alleged affidavit, released over the weekend and viewed almost 9 million times, outlines a series of damning accusations, including the assertion that the Harris campaign was given sample questions before the debate and that ABC News specifically agreed to fact-check Trump while allowing Harris to go unchecked.
The alleged affidavit stated:
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL“Observations Pertaining to Debate Fairness: I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris that raise concerns about procedural fairness: The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows:
- The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.
- It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to factchecking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.
- The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.
The affidavit, signed and notarized on September 9th, 2024, included a certified letter allegedly sent to Speaker Mike Johnson and recordings of conversations that support the whistleblower’s claims. The whistleblower also sent a Federal Express package containing the affidavit.
This was two days after the ABC News presidential debate, where the hosts repeatedly fake “fact-checked” President Trump and allowed any bit of nonsense that came out of Kamala Harris’s mouth to go unchallenged.
Affirmation of Documentation:
- This affidavit has been signed and notarized on September 9th, 2024, to ensure that the allegations set forth are formally documented prior to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
- In addition to notarizing this affidavit, I have sent a certified letter to myself, postmarked September 9th, 2024, which will remain unopened for any future investigations.
- I have also dispatched a Federal Express package containing this affidavit, sent on September 9th, 2024, and delivered to my residence on September 10th, 2024, which will remain unopened for potential investigative purposes.
- Furthermore, I have sent a certified letter to Speaker Mike Johnson, dated September 9th, 2024, to establish a record that the correspondence was sent before the debate commenced.
- Additionally, For further investigation, I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate.
According to the alleged affidavit, the Harris team has tightly controlled the narrative by dictating the scope of questions allowed in interviews.
If true, this would be the biggest scandal of the press since the last time they rigged something.
I do not even know how I ended up here but I thought this post was great I dont know who you are but definitely youre going to a famous blogger if you arent already Cheers