So here’s what’s really going on with Biden’s White House staff and lawyers right now. They’re in big trouble over this whole autopen mess, and honestly, that’s the only way to read what happened when you look at this absolutely ridiculous New York Times piece trying to cover for them. It’s unprecedented what they did with that autopen machine.
Let’s be honest. After four years of watching his “performance” in the Oval Office, if you can even call it that, does anyone seriously believe Joe Biden sat down and personally read through 8,000 pardons signed by an autopen? Are we supposed to pretend he had the cognitive stamina to process the legal language in those documents? Or the judgment to make sound decisions on each one? Come on, man.
From The New York Times:
In an interview with The New York Times, Mr. Biden said that he had orally granted all the pardons and commutations issued at the end of his term, calling President Trump and other Republicans “liars” for claiming his aides had used an autopen to do so without his authorization.
“I made every decision,” Mr. Biden said in a phone interview on Thursday, asserting that he had his staff use an autopen replicating his signature on the clemency warrants because “we’re talking about a whole lot of people.”
Let me break down what we learned from a New York Times article headlined, “Biden Says He Made The Clemency Decisions That Were Recorded With Autopen,” because there are some real bombshells buried in there.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL
First off, there’s no direct evidence that shows Biden truly authorized any of these last-minute autopen pardons. None. What does the New York Times give us instead? Just claims from his staff saying things like he totally said the autopen was okay. That’s it. That’s their evidence.
There are two types of truth: Objective Truth and Performative Truth. Objective truth is rooted in verifiable facts, something that can be proven by evidence that can be used to support the declaration. For instance, saying “it’s freezing outside” is objectively true if the thermometer reads 30 degrees. Performative truth, on the other hand, has no factual foundation. It relies solely on the “authority” of the person making the claim. The person saying it acts as its own proof. A perfect example? “There was no evidence of election fraud in the 2020 election.” That’s not objective truth, it’s performative.
What the New York Times and the Biden staffers are doing is spreading performative truth. The staffers and the Democratic Party, in my own belief, are trying to cover for those who used the autopen because an action like that could take down the party even worse than it is experiencing right now.
Biden’s staff admitted that he didn’t authorize clemency grants and pardons for multiple named individuals. They just went ahead and did it, anyway.
Biden’s staff admitted to changing documents that Biden had supposedly already authorized, then signing them with the autopen without getting those changes approved by anyone. Think about that for a second. They’re changing official presidential documents and auto-signing them.
But perhaps the most telling part of this whole story is what the New York Times accidentally revealed about Biden himself. After spending years telling us how mentally sharp and competent Biden was, they dropped this little gem right in their story:
Age-related cognitive decline is a spectrum. At one end, many older people become more prone to blanking on names or losing their train of thought when speaking at length, but remain able to process information and make reasoned decisions. At the other, some develop profound dementia.
That’s quite a change from all the propaganda they were feeding us just a year ago about Biden’s razor-sharp mental skills, isn’t it?
This whole thing stinks, and the Times piece trying to defend it just makes it smell worse.
#bidenautopen #whitehousecorruption #huntercoverup
