J6er Treniss Evans, through his legal advocacy group Condemned USA, filed a Supreme Court petition on Friday seeking to halt the contentious New York case against former President Donald Trump.
Evans’ appeal says that permitting New York to proceed will result in conflicting interpretations of federal law across states, jeopardizing national legal consistency and fairness. The petition requests an immediate stay of the trial procedures in New York, as well as intervention by the Supreme Court to avert additional potential injustice.
Evans also asks for a thorough examination of the trial record, claiming that Trump may be entitled to a petition of habeas corpus, a fundamental guarantee against unjust and indefinite imprisonment.
The petition refers to the Supreme Court’s decision in Norma Jean Anderson v. Trump, which determined that state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to enforce a non-uniform version of federal law. Evans says that the New York trial misunderstands and uses federal campaign funding law in different ways, which goes against the judicial estoppel principle set up in Anderson v. Trump.
Evans claims violations of the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection and due process requirements, implying possible bias and selective prosecution by the New York District Attorney.
According to Evans, federal authority preempts the State of New York’s attempt to prosecute Trump under federal campaign finance law. He contends that because the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) declined to prosecute the case, it is outside the state’s authority.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELEvans alleges that New York prosecutes misdemeanor crimes beyond the statute of limitations, and that federal campaign finance legislation is being applied inconsistently.
The petition alleges that Judge Juan Merchan’s actions contribute to the perception of prejudice, weakening public trust in the judicial process. This perceived wrongdoing could have a long-term impact on public trust in our legal system.
Finally, Evans contends that New York’s actions affect voters nationwide, necessitating the Supreme Court’s participation. This, Evans claims, weakens the democratic process and violates voters’ fundamental rights.
Evans took to social media and tweeted, “BREAKING NEWS! Supreme Court Petition FILED TODAY to stop the NEW YORK TRUMP CASE! WE THE PEOPLE ARE BEING DISENFRANCHISED AS VOTERS. Show your support for Condemned USA as we move to seek justice at the United States Supreme Court. Read below and tell the court: WE WANT JUSTICE!”
BREAKING NEWS! Supreme Court Petition FILED TODAY to stop the NEW YORK TRUMP CASE! WE THE PEOPLE ARE BEING DISENFRANCHISED AS VOTERS. Show your support for Condemned USA as we move to seek justice at the United States Supreme Court. Read below and tell the court: WE WANT JUSTICE! pic.twitter.com/Pk8ZKcBpTH
— Treniss J. Evans III (@CondemnedUSA) June 8, 2024
This is something similar to the Texas case during the 2020 election, where they argued that the battleground states where all the cheating was going on were not just harming those states but every single voter’s right to vote for who they wanted to represent them. Chief Justice John Roberts acted like a wussy and refused to take the case because he feared riots outside the Supreme Court or worse, his home.
#supremecourtpetition #trumpcase #legalchallenge
