Attorney Robert Costello, Michael Cohen’s former legal adviser, spoke with Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night after testifying to the Manhattan Grand Jury investigating President Donald Trump on Monday.
Costello told the FOX News audience that he testified in front of Alvin Bragg’s Manhattan Grand Jury for two hours.
“I spoke to the jury for two hours,” Robert Costello told Tucker Carlson. “It was clear to me the Manhattan Grand Jury did not want to get to the truth.”
And it has now been revealed that New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg hid exculpatory evidence from the Grand Jury!
Soros-funded DA Alvin Bragg intentionally withheld 594 pages of exculpatory evidence to the New York Grand Jury investigating President Donald Trump, according to FOX News legal expert Gregg Jarrett.
Jarrett said, “I mentioned it yesterday, I think, when Bob Costello got into that Grand Jury room and told them, ‘Wait a minute. You don’t have the hundreds of pages I handed over to Alvin Bragg over here? You only have six cherry-picked documents?’ You know, hiding from grand juries exculpatory information is reprehensible and unconscionable. And the conduct of Alvin Bragg and his henchman Mark Pomeranz, who specifically says in his book, ‘We’re targeting zombies because we don’t like his beliefs,’ those guys should face disbarment proceedings.”
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELOnce again, the real criminals are revealed.
And Jarrett is correct. If a prosecutor withholds one page of exculpatory evidence, he could be disbarred. Even if he doesn’t know that it’s among the 17 million other pages they handed over because it is his duty to find exculpatory evidence. This means that Bragg can be disbarred 594 times.
On Fox News on Tuesday night, Dershowitz told host Sean Hannity that “Bob Costello has changed this case dramatically.”
“I think that Bragg now only has two possible results from that. Number one, he can say, ‘alright, I’m going to try to make the case without Cohen.’ He cannot use Cohen as a witness anymore. That would be unethical because of the testimony that Costello gave,” Dershowitz said. “Or he could say, ‘look, I have to drop the case.’ He may not be able to make it without Cohen. But if he can’t make it without Cohen, he can’t make it, because no ethical prosecutor is allowed to put on as a witness somebody who has told the lies and has contradicted himself so much.”
While it’s unclear what charges Bragg will face, the legal path to an indictment is complicated, according to POLITICO. Bragg’s case is likely to test a novel legal theory that under New York law, falsifying business records is a felony if the records were falsified to conceal a federal crime, which in this case would be a campaign finance crime similar to the one Cohen pleaded guilty to.
According to constitutional attorney Alan Dershowitz, Costello’s testimony has slowed, if not halted, Bragg’s progress toward any potential indictment.
“I think that Bob Costello — it’s a game changer. I think maybe that’s a reason for the delay here. I think ethical experts are now telling Bragg, ‘wait a minute, you cannot use Cohen,’” said Dershowitz. “But if you can’t make it without Cohen, you cannot bring this charge.”
