I find this to be shocking. Who knew the man who has admitted to being a drug addict, paying hookers for sex, ignoring his love child, and making million-dollar deals with our enemies even possessed character. Where does he keep it hidden? Fort Knox? And exactly what is he saying they lied about? Does he mean he really didn’t do all of those things?
What exactly is defamation? As defined by alllaw.com:
Defamation can occur when someone makes a false statement of fact about you, and you suffer harm as a result (financial damage or harm to your reputation, for example). In this article, we’ll discuss some of the important evidence that you will need to gather (and be ready to present) in order to make sure your defamation lawsuit is successful.
Types Of Evidence in a Defamation Case
In any kind of civil lawsuit, the purpose of evidence is to persuade the trier of fact—in a defamation trial, that’s usually a jury—that a fact or issue of the case is or is not established. Evidence can either be direct or circumstantial.
Direct Evidence. Direct evidence means that the evidence supports the disputed fact without the need for any intervening inference. For example, a witness testifying that they heard the defamatory statement would be direct evidence.
Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial evidence, on the other hand, consists of a fact or series of facts that, if proven, indirectly prove another fact. Circumstantial evidence is the most common form of evidence. In a defamation case, an example of circumstantial evidence would be proof that the defendant is the domain name owner of a website where a defamatory statement was posted.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELHunter’s Hollywood lawyer Kevin Morris spoke with Biden’s allies in a private meeting last year and he suggested filing lawsuits against those who have said nasty things about Hunter Biden.
The Washington Post reported:
“Morris, at the meeting in his California home, described defamation lawsuits the team could pursue against the presidential son’s critics, including Fox News, Eric Trump and Rudy Giuliani. He outlined extensive research on two potential witnesses against Hunter Biden — a spurned business partner named Tony Bobulinski and a computer repairman named John Paul Mac Isaac.”
The Washington Post reported:
Hunter Biden’s friend and lawyer Kevin Morris was blunt in laying out his thoughts at a strategy session last September on an expected onslaught of investigations by House Republicans: It was crucial, he suggested, for Hunter Biden’s camp to be more aggressive.
Morris, at the meeting in his California home, described defamation lawsuits the team could pursue against the presidential son’s critics, including Fox News, Eric Trump and Rudy Giuliani. He outlined extensive research on two potential witnesses against Hunter Biden — a spurned business partner named Tony Bobulinski and a computer repairman named John Paul Mac Isaac.
At one point, Hunter Biden himself happened to call into the meeting, connecting briefly by video to add his own thoughts.
“They feel that there is a whole counternarrative missing because of the whole Hunter-hater narrative out there,” said liberal activist David Brock, who attended the meeting. “What we really got into was more the meat of it, the meat of what a response would look like.” Brock was planning for a new group, Facts First USA, focused on fighting the looming House GOP investigations.
The meeting was a glimpse into a sprawling infrastructure that is rapidly, almost frantically, assembling to combat Republicans’ plans to turn Hunter Biden into a major news story when the GOP takes over the House next year. The risk for Hunter Biden, and possibly for President Biden as well, is that this hodgepodge of efforts is not fully coordinating and does not share a unified approach, according to people involved in the effort who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal dynamics.
This is a simple plan to wag the dog. To distract from the many investigations that the Republicans in the House that various committees will be looking into. The lawsuits have little merit, but they could serve as intimidation against those who go after the president’s son and the president himself. The best defense in a defamation case is the truth. No one is saying what statements were made that were false.
Hunter would be more successful if he sued for definition of character in my opinion. That they could prove. As for the lawsuit they are planning I suggest chicken wings, beer, and really tall boots.
