Most people have never heard about what federal investigators uncovered back in the early nineties. It was not a rumor. It was not speculation. It was a documented plan tied directly to Hamas, and its goal was to weaken the United States from the inside. What investigators found through surveillance, court proceedings, and years of intelligence work revealed an organized effort with three specific parts. Much of it came to light after a 1993 meeting in a Philadelphia hotel room, a meeting that exposed a blueprint far deeper than anyone realized at the time.
The first component of this operation was a group called the Holyland Foundation. Its job was straightforward. It existed to raise money. This plot required funding, and the Holyland Foundation was built to gather the cash that would make the larger plan possible.
The second component was an organization known as the Islamic Association for Palestine. This group handled the propaganda. That meant shaping messages, influencing sympathizers, and creating ideological support for Hamas inside the United States. Their effort was not passive. It was designed to persuade people to adopt a worldview that worked against American institutions.
The third part of the structure was the United Association for Studies and Research. It functioned like a political think tank. It supplied intellectual justification and strategic direction. When you put all three groups together, you get the skeleton of a plan designed to infiltrate the United States quietly and effectively.
Federal agents were aware of the 1993 meeting because two years earlier, in 1991, Hamas leadership circulated a memo that made their intent impossible to miss. The memo stated clearly that the organization wanted to destabilize the United States from within. They wanted a network of ideological actors who would slowly work their way into American institutions and weaken them. Their long-term goal was political influence. They wanted to reach Congress and elected officials. They wanted to use political power to dismantle the country.
When agents observed the Philadelphia meeting, they knew their suspicions were accurate. Over time, the government prosecuted many of the key figures involved. Several of these organizations were forced to shut down. The Islamic Association for Palestine dissolved after the prosecutions, but the group did not actually go away. It simply rebranded itself.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELThe propaganda arm resurfaced under a new name. It became American Muslims for Palestine. This group still exists today. Its founder later created a second organization that many Americans recognize. He launched Students for Justice in Palestine. That group is well known on college campuses and is embraced by left-wing student activists across the country.
At the first national conference for Students for Justice in Palestine, the keynote speaker was a man named Mahmood Mamani. His presence matters because he is the father of Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected mayor of New York City.
This is where things begin to connect. Zohran Mamdani describes himself openly as a Muslim Marxist. During his campaign, he said he entered politics to “remake this city in our image.” If you hear that statement without context, it sounds routine. It sounds like political talk. Once you understand the network behind him, the organizations that shaped the movement before him, and the ideological path he comes from, the meaning becomes very different.
You are left asking a basic question. When he says he wants to remake the city in “our image,” who is “our”? What worldview does that refer to? How far back does that worldview go?
These are not abstract questions. They trace directly to a documented plan by Hamas to infiltrate American institutions, influence political power, and reshape the United States from within. As you look more closely, the connections become easier to see.
A debate is growing around Mamdani’s statements and ideology. It starts with the comment he made about wanting to “remake this city in our image.” That line pushes the next question onto the table. In what image does he want to remake New York City, and what does he plan to do to get there?
Nothing in his phrasing sounds rooted in traditional American values. It sounds like someone who wants to refashion the city into the likeness of a group he personally identifies with. Mamdani was not born in the United States. He follows a specific sect within Islam. His statements suggest a desire to reshape the culture and identity of the city based on those influences.
He has also been caught on camera saying there is an “illusion” that all Muslims can become New Yorkers or settle comfortably into the city’s culture. He insists this idea is not true. That claim raises obvious concerns. If he thinks Muslims cannot integrate into New York as it currently exists, then what exactly does he have in mind when he says he wants to remake the city? What part of the culture does he want to remove, and what does he want to replace it with?
To be fair, there would be no reason to doubt that he is sincere in his socialist ideology. He is an active member of the Democratic Socialists of America. He has described himself as embracing certain communist ideas. He appears to believe those ideas genuinely. But does he?
Islamic fundamentalists figured out pretty fast that they cannot sell their ideology in the West because it conflicts with nearly everything Western culture stands for. And over time, they came to realize that they could get people to listen to them if they went the route of socialism. Communists have learned how to falsely teach young Americans that socialism would bring a more equal society.
The trouble with the DSA’s version of socialism, especially in the hands of people like Mamdani and Ilhan Omar, is that it behaves like a Trojan horse. It sells itself as simple policy reform, but it ends up opening the door to a much darker influence. That influence creates an ideological overlap to jihadist movements.
Across the country, a strange alliance has formed between far-left communists and jihadist movements. Their values may be very different in many ways, but they share one goal. Both want to undermine the core principles of the United States. They may disagree on what should replace the current system, but they agree on tearing down the one we have.
This shared objective forms a bridge between movements that appear incompatible. When a political figure speaks about remaking the nation’s largest city “in our image,” while rejecting the idea that everyone who lives there can fit into its cultural identity, the public has every reason to ask what influences are actually driving that vision. New York’s future could depend on the answer. If New Yorkers don’t smarten up, these people will turn the Big Apple into the next Londonistan.
#hamasexposed #nycpolitics #americafirst
