US Attorney Matthew Graves is in the crosshairs of justice and US Attorney Ed Martin for using trumped-up charges to make political prisoners of J6 protesters. Graves used the 1512(c)(2) obstruction charges against 1,500 J6 protesters, including many who never entered the Capitol. The Supreme Court spanked him for that overreach and now US Attorney Ed Martin is investigating to determine if Graves belongs behind bars. (SPOILER ALERT…Yes, he does.) Matthew Graves resigned last month, but that can’t protect him from prosecution.
Per Julie Kelly:
“Ed Martin called the use of 1512c2 a “great failure” of the office and directed staff to immediately deliver “all files, documents, notes, emails, and other information” related to 1512c2 charging decisions to two other prosecutors, who will prepare a preliminary report for Martin by this Friday.”
Biden’s corrupt DOJ charged more than 300 J6ers with 18 USC §1512(c)(2). Jack Smith charged the President with two counts of the statute.
The decision also has implications for former President Donald Trump, who was charged with the same crime — though that impact appears to be more limited than some initially predicted.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELHundreds of other charges are pending: The opinion gives the Justice Department room to refile cases against at least some rioters accused of obstruction because it will continue to allow them to prosecute in situations in which people attempted to impact “documents” and “other things” used in an official proceeding.
Approximately 249 cases involving the obstruction charge are pending – and in every one of those cases, the defendant faces other charges, including felonies and misdemeanors. About 52 people were convicted and sentenced with the obstruction charge as their only felony. Of those, 27 people are currently incarcerated, according to prosecutors.
18 USC §1512(c)(2):
Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court held that to prove a violation of the law, the government must show that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or other things used in an official proceeding, or attempted to do so.
The opinion reads:
“To prove a violation of Section 1512(c)(2), the Government must establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or as we earlier explained, other things used in the proceeding, or attempted to do so. See supra, at 9. The judgment of the D. C. Circuit is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. On remand, the D. C. Circuit may assess the sufficiency of Count Three of Fischer’s indictment in light of our interpretation of Section 1512(c)(2).”
The charge was fraudulent from the beginning. It came from the Enron/Arthur Anderson case where the defendant was shredding documents that were subpoenaed by Congress. The communists in the DOJ used that charge to hit the J6 defendants with more charges. Most Americans had no idea because the communists kept using the words “obstruct an official proceeding.” Those who bogusly used the charge should indeed be investigated.
#j6justice #supremecourtvictory #bidendojexposed
