When I first saw this headline, I thought he had been caught not declaring his bribes from the DNC on his income tax return. But, as I read the story, I realized that it was much more sinister than that. America First Legal (AFL) has filed a bombshell lawsuit against Chief Justice John G. Roberts, as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The suit also lists Robert J. Conrad, Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, for running what AFL describes as an “unconstitutional shadow agency” and violating federal transparency laws.
The lawsuit, filed on April 22, slams the Judicial Conference of the United States and its administrative arm, headed by the corrupt John Roberts. The suit refers to them as rogue executive agencies.” And that they have collaborated with far-left lawmakers to wage lawfare against conservative Supreme Court justices.
According to the lawsuit viewed by The Gateway Pundit:
“For several years, the media and enterprising lawmakers have launched an onslaught to destroy the impartiality and political neutrality of Article III courts and, particularly, the Supreme Court. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh have all faced political and physical threats because of the politicization and weaponization of the law.
This lawfare has been led by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson, relying upon an ideologically favorable legacy media to falsely accuse Justices Thomas and Alito of ethical improprieties. Their aim was simple: to chill the judicial independence of these Supreme Court Justices.”
After the agencies flatly denied the requests, claiming FOIA doesn’t apply to them, AFL took them to court:
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL“The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office are central levers for Senator Whitehouse and Representative Johnson’s lawfare enterprise. The Conference and the Administrative Office have actively accommodated oversight requests from these congressmen concerning their allegations against Justices Thomas and Alito.
Under our constitutional tradition, accommodations with Congress are the province of the executive branch. The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office are therefore executive agencies. Such agencies must be overseen by the President, not the courts. Judicial relief here not only preserves the separation of powers but also keeps the courts out of politics.
Courts definitively do not create agencies to exercise functions beyond resolving cases or controversies or administratively supporting those functions. But the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts does exactly that.
The Judicial Conference’s duties are executive functions and must be supervised by executive officers who are appointed and accountable to other executive officers.
Thus, the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office exercise executive functions and are accordingly subject to FOIA. Accordingly, their refusal to comply with AFL’s FOIA request is unlawful.”
#exposetheswamp #judicialcorruption #americafirst