A flood of lawsuits against early Trump administration moves, which have led judges to temporarily block Trump’s spending freeze and force health agencies coul actually be playing right into the plans of Presidet Trump. Sooner or later the court will have to dcide who is in charge of the executive branch ohf the government which will force te Supreme Court to follow the Costitution and name Trump as the leader and not leftwing kooks trying hide what they have been hiding for years.
GianCarlo Canaparo, senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies:
“Ironically, in rushing to trip up Trump, these judges may empower him when all is said and done.
“Not only do I expect they will ultimately be reversed on appeal, but by overreaching they have given Trump exactly the vehicles he wants to overrule some of those old Supreme Court precedents. And, of course, they’ve teed up a challenge to nationwide injunctions, which the Supreme Court seems ready to abolish.”
From The Daily Caller
A federal judge in Maryland blocked Trump from restricting hospitals that offer child sex-change procedures from receiving federal funds on Thursday. Another federal judge in Washington, D.C. also blocked Trump from terminating foreign aid contracts and grants issued prior to his inauguration.
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELA federal appeals court rejected the administration’s request on Tuesday to lift an order blocking its funding freeze. The judge who issued the temporary restraining order clarified Wednesday that his order did not prevent the administration from ending funding based on “actual authority in the applicable statutory, regulatory, or grant terms,” permitting them to move forward with pulling funding from the housing of migrants in New York.
A federal judge lifted a temporary freeze on Trump’s buyout offer for federal workers on Wednesday.
The executive order on birthright citizenship, which four federal judges have already blocked, will likely end up at the Supreme Court. But the most lasting change Trump’s actions could make at the high court might be surrounding the role of executive power.
Mike Davis added:
“President Trump is acting fully within his Article II powers with these executive orders. Activist judges are attempting to steal his executive power over nothing more than political differences. This is unacceptable, and these activist judges are creating a constitutional crisis. If it comes to the Supreme Court to put an end to this, then so be it.”
Harvard law professor Jeannie Suk Gersen noted:
“[W]hat is playing out through a veneer of chaos is a deliberate and organized tactical program to undertake actions that provoke a raft of lawsuits, some of which could become good vehicles for establishing a constitutional vision in which the President has sole authority over the entire executive branch.”
Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris said:
“To the extent that Humphrey’s Executor requires otherwise, the Department intends to urge the Supreme Court to overrule that decision, which prevents the President from adequately supervising principal officers in the Executive Branch who execute the laws on the President’s behalf, and which has already been severely eroded by recent Supreme Court decisions.”
Canaparo told the DCNF:
“The Constitution vests the executive power in the president, and all of it must be accountable to the voters through him. That said, the president should also work with allies in Congress to get Congress to take back the legislative power that it has delegated to the executive. The president should not be our chief lawmaker, but he is our chief executive. That’s a very important distinction that the Founders appreciated but we have forgotten.”
