For years the Deep State within the intelligence agencies have tried to destroy President Trump using lies and fake intelligence, all the while they were protected by their cronies at the agencies and the lapdog media. But, they no longer have that protection as President Trump and his cabinet have been draining the swamp. Both Mark Milley and John Brennan are in a race to see which one goes to prison first. Brennan has the edge since treason can carry the death penalty.
Suddenly, former CIA Director John Brennan is in the spotlight. On Saturday, George Papadopoulos revealed the contents of an email that apparently shows that Brennan allegedly knowingly lied about Trump having ties to Vladimir Putin and Russia and his signing of the letter blaming Russian misinformation about Hunter Biden’s laptop.
John Brennan admits in the leaked email that the petition signed by the “51 intel experts” was only meant to push back on President Trump. They were trying to protect dementia Joe and his crack-addled son, Hunter.
According to Paul Sperry:
In a pre-hearing questionnaire obtained by RealClearInvestigations, Senate Democrats asked Ratcliffe, “Do you agree with the ICA’s judgments,” specifically that “Putin’s goals in influencing the 2016 presidential election included ‘denigrat[ing] Secretary Clinton, and harm[ing] her electability and potential presidency’ ”?
VISIT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELThey also asked Ratcliffe if he concurred with the ICA’s finding that “Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.”
Ratcliffe answered that after reviewing the ICA’s underlying intel, including sources and methods, he could only agree that “Russia’s goal was to undermine confidence in U.S. democratic institutions and sow division among the American people,” according to page 38 of the document.
He noted that “Russian social media campaigns included efforts to both support and criticize candidate Trump as well as candidate Clinton, further suggesting an overarching goal of promoting discord.” In other words, he saw no concrete evidence to support a plot by Putin to side with Trump against Clinton.
In the questionnaire, Ratcliffe also pointed out that Moscow has “long used” propaganda, disinformation, and cyberattacks to target not only U.S. elections but also those in other Western democracies, implying its 2016 influence operation was nothing new.
Ratcliffe saw for himself the underlying evidence while acting as Trump’s director of the Office of National Intelligence.
In 2020, he discovered a CIA document from 2016 stating that Clinton, in July of that year, had approved “a plan” by her foreign policy adviser, Jake Sullivan, to create a scandal tying Trump to Putin and the alleged Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee. The CIA material seemed to contradict the findings of the ICA, prepared and widely disseminated just months later by his predecessor John Brennan, who, as Barack Obama’s CIA director, was tasked after Trump’s surprise victory to assess Russia’s role in the election.
Raising more alarms, Brennan had attached as an annex to the ICA false rumors about Trump and Putin conspiring during the election, plucked from a political dossier underwritten by the Clinton campaign.
Suspicious, Ratcliffe decided to look deeper into how the ICA was developed, according to his Senate confirmation testimony.
“I requested a briefing from the CIA from some members of the team that were involved in that,” he said.
After interviewing CIA analysts who helped draft the ICA and examining the underlying intelligence, he reached different conclusions. Ratcliffe’s review found the evidence was much weaker than Brennan had claimed and did not support his explosive judgments about Putin and Trump.
This flies in the face of what the public has been told about one of the most consequential pieces of intelligence in modern American history.
By painting Trump as a Trojan Horse for Putin, the ICA triggered years-long investigations by a special counsel and by both the Senate and House intelligence committees. It also provided the foundation for thousands of Russiagate articles questioning the patriotism, credibility, and legitimacy of the Trump presidency, including stories that won a Pulitzer Prize for both the Washington Post and the New York Times…
…Brennan has insisted the ICA didn’t rely on the Clinton campaign’s anti-Trump dossier and that his team obtained separate Russian intelligence that was highly classified and could not be shared publicly.
It wouldn’t be the first time Brennan, a Democrat who openly supported Clinton and previously worked in the White House with Obama, has played politics with U.S. intelligence.
Trump last week stripped Brennan of his top-secret security clearance, arguing he signed an intelligence community letter just weeks before the 2020 election falsely claiming that incriminating emails found on Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop by the New York Post appeared to be Russian disinformation. On MSNBC, Brennan dismissed Trump’s order as part of “his effort to try to get back at those individuals who have criticized him openly and publicly in the past, and I think very legitimately.”
#DeepStateExposed #BrennanLied #TrumpWasRight
